Logical God Vs Biblical God Essay Research free essay sample

Logical God Vs Biblical God Essay, Research Paper Can the descriptions of God, claimed by the Bible, be proven? In Descartes? Meditations, Descartes logically proved the being of an space and true being. The Holy Bible describes God, our Godhead. I plan to compare the logically proved space being ( God ) and the Biblical God and see if their traits mirror each other. If they do so it would turn out, if non give strong grounds, that they are one in the same. First I will repeat Descartes? cogent evidence of an space and true being. P1-Ideas are either internal, external, or innate. P2-The thought of eternity is non internal. P3-The thought of eternity is non external. P4-The thought of eternity is hence unconditioned. P5-Any cause must be greater than or equal to it? s consequence. P6-An space being is the cause of the thought of eternity. We will write a custom essay sample on Logical God Vs Biblical God Essay Research or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page P1-P6 proves that their exists an infinite being. P7- Established is an space, true being. Since it? s space, so it? s boundlessly wise. In Plato? s The Republic, Socrates proved that a wiseman would be Just. Therefore, an infinate being would be boundlessly Just. So if the Bible is truth, and the Biblical God exists, so God would be boundlessly wise and Just every bit good. Following this logic, everything God carries out in the Bible must follow the guidelines of Justice. If there is an case where God displayed an act of unfairness, it proves at least the prophesier to be false. I have non inspected every line in the Bible nor do I program to. But I will travel over some of the chief rules of Christianity, with a focal point on Catholosism, and see if they follow that which is Just. The chose Catholosism for two grounds. One is because it? s my faith and it? s the one I know the most approximately. Second is because of it? s positions of Salvation, which is the chief focal point of faith. The Bible is translated in many different ways by different faiths. Many faiths believe that all you need is faith. Catholosism believes in religion and works. I will utilize the most utmost position, which is Catholosism. The stairss to redemption are that you must hold religion. When you have faith so you must besides hold repented all mortal sin.. In Catholosism the two sorts of wickedness are Mortal and Veniel. Mortal wickednesss are called person because what it does is kill your redemption. You must atone a mortal wickedness to have God? s grace one time once more. A Veniel wickedness is a less serious 1 that still lets you have God? s grace. That is, they need non be repented. If your psyche is clean of all mortal wickednesss so you are all right. If non so your traveling to hell. Now, does this follow in the logic of what an space and true being would make? Well a wickedness is an case where you gave in to your desires. An Ideal homo would neer make that. Any case where you put appetite before wisdom are all covered within the 10 commandments. Therefore the thought of? wickedness? is sound. Then comes the separation of a veniel wickedness and mortal wickedness. One might believe that the separation is God go throughing opinion on you. Passing opinion on person to populate everlastingly in snake pit would harm them. It would do the Judgement shaper unjust and less baronial. Therefore an boundlessly wise being, God, would non make this. He doesn? T do this. The separation is non a passing of opinion. God makes regulations and Lashkar-e-Taibas you choose your way. If you chose one that would set down you in snake pit, so God will give you the chance to atone and clean your psyche of that mortal wickedness. Evidence besides shows that you may perpetrate as many Venial wickednesss as you want. He does non utilize a balance graduated table to find you redemption. Which proves that it is in no manner go throughing opinion. Many may still reason, why is Catholosism prophesying? concluding opinion by the male parent? . If you examine the term Judgement, it means to do a determination or organize an sentiment. Since God is all knowing, he need non do determinations or sentiment since he knows all that is truth. Therefore, neither wo uld it be Just or possible for God for base on balls Judgement. Judgement, as stated in Catholosism, is used for deficiency of better term. The existent definition is? looking into your psyche to happen truth. ? That truth will find whether you go to hell or heaven. Then comes the inquiry of, why is faith necessarry. It is non nesarely necessary. An nescient homo who was neer given a opportunity to take religion is non excluded from Eden. The 1s without religion who are excluded are the 1s who consciously chose non to set their religion in God, but instead to set their religion in something else or nil at all. That all follows what is Just, hence Salvation as Catholics translate the Bible follows. Another belief is that of Purgatory. Purgatory happens when you have no mortal wickednesss, but your psyche must be cleaned of Venial wickedness before you may confront God in Eden. In The Republic, a differentiation was made between harming person and aching person, being that harming makes one less baronial and pain may do one more baronial. A being who is Just being would neer make injury. Purgatory is an illustration of injury without injury because it cleans the psyche of every case of wickedness. Therefore Purgatory would be one of the supreme Acts of the Apostless of Justice. Following I will analyze Jesus, the boy of God. It would be logical for the boy of an infinite being to be an ideal homo. An ideal homo would perpetrate no wickedness and commit no unfairness. Or, he would neer give in to his appetencies when logically it would be unwise. Jesus neer committed a wickedness, and did good plants and carried out what was Just. Jesus was that Ideal homo. Since Jesus was human, finally he would hold to decease. Which happened when they crucified him on the cross. He died on the wickednesss of the Jews who were existent worlds ( non-Ideal ) . They gave in to their appetencies when logically there was no ground for his executing. You can infer that they committed a wickedness when they killed him. Jesus died for our wickednesss. It would non be difficult to turn out the executing of Jesus because of the kept records from that clip. I will now take myself off the particular topic of God and put a focal point on Jesus. A strong cogent evidence may be made non merely on God, but on Catholosism as a whole. Harmonizing to Bible, Jesus stated that whatever his 12 aposoles preached would be as if he preached it himself. They were the laminitiss of Catholosism with Peter, one of the 12, taking caput as the Pope. Through the old ages, Catholosism has non changed in their ideals and beliefs as the other faiths have. They stuck with whatever the original 12 have said. And it is logical to cognize every bit good that ideals besides neer alteration. If the popular belief on an issue has changed, it wouldn? Ts make sense to alter the ideal every bit good. It would be a false belief of logic to conform merely because of a bulk. In decision, I have non found any defects in logic within the bible? s description of God. All his traits and procedures of redemption mirror that of what an space and true being would be and utilize. Along with this, I was able to, unpurposely, accomplish two other things. One was create or place a method for confuting any godly Bible. Simply put, if a prophesier makes a description of God, but that description does non follow logically into what an space and true being is, so the description is incorrect. Therefore, anything else that prophesier has written may fall into inquiry and he may be defined a false prophesier. I have found none such instance and a cogent evidence that I will neer happen such a instance has non been presented to me. The 2nd thing that was unpurposally accomplished was a strong statement taking toward the overall truthfulness of Catholosism. The Catholic Ideals follow logically what is God, and the boy of God. It didn? t alteration with any popular thought of a clip. Any alteration in ideal that did happen was deemed unfair and changed back. It besides didn? t sprout out of no where merely because one did non hold with an ideal. What I have presented was a strong statement that should give Catholosism a logical border over others, and do it a logitions faith.

Gender and Theology Essays

Gender and Theology Essays Gender and Theology Essay Gender and Theology Essay Gender Theology Name: Institution: Gender Theology : 1. Traditional complimentarian views on marriage are biblical. Such roles gain emphasis with respect to the roles designated to both men and women especially in the Creation Account. The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood points out that the establishment of Adam’s headship gained verification even before the Fall (van Leeuwen, 2013). Such views also receive depiction in the roles that women played without mention including Sarah, Rebekkah and Hagar who demonstrated the submissive responsibilities of women in the Bible. 2. To an extent, traditional Christian perspectives on marital roles are indeed problematic. The contention arises from the roles assigned to both man and woman in the Creation Account as well as Jesus and Paul’s directives within the New Testament (Sparks, 2012). Traditionalists see the husband as the head and the wife as being submissive, while egalitarians argue that the Creation Account does not define the role of the woman as a submissive role but rather grants equal partnership (George, 2009). 3. Abandoning conventional marital roles diminishes the unity embodied when both man and woman unite to become one. As directed by Jesus, even though the husband embodies male headship, he is to love his wife as Christ loves the church. When the roles are overturned, the consequences arising affect the social and marital lives of the partners and society as a whole. Straying from such norms only leads to an abandonment of the practices common to marriage and various social problems especially divorce, rebellion and neglect of the family. 4. Rubio is neither egalitarian nor complimentarian, as she underlines the problems of marriage from both perspectives. Rubio focuses on the observance of the conventional marital views, and the advocates for equality in marriage in order to facilitate discipleship among families in and out of the church (Rubio, 2003). On a personal assessment, Rubio only focuses on the development of the family irrespective of complimentarian and egalitarian views. 5. Rubio’s emphasis on children and parenting focuses mainly on the family. According to Rubio, conventional views on marriage suppress the working woman’s role in the family as a mother since such views sustain hierarchy in marriage (Rubio, 2003; Spencer, 2009). In summary of the contention surrounding complimentarism and egalitarianism, it is truly evident to ask this; is it necessary to inculcate feminist and patriarchal debates even within the Bible? References George, Janet. Still side by side: A concise explanation of Biblical equality. Minneapolis: Christians for Biblical Equality, 2009. Print. Rubio, Julie H. A Christian theology of marriage and family. New York: Paulist Press, 2003. Print. Sparks, K. L. Sacred word, broken word. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013. Print. Spencer, Ai?da B. Marriage at the crossroads: Couples in conversation about discipleship, gender roles, decision-making, and intimacy. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2009. Print. van Leeuwen, M. S. (2004). Is equal regard in the Bible? In D. Blankenhorn, D.S. Browning M. S. van Leeuwen (Eds.), Does Christianity teach male headship? The equal-regard marriage and its critics (pp.13-22). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Discuss the various theories that might help explain a person's Essay

Discuss the various theories that might help explain a person's attraction to and an involvement in the subcultures of outlaw motorcycle gangs - Essay Example Further, resistance to the social hierarchy motivated most of these people to participate to the motorcycle gang. This theory holds that these motorcycle clubs offers a platform for a person with high propensity for criminal activity to unite to form a group in order to run businesses of different levels of sophistication. A person can also be attracted to these groups because of social isolation (Hayes, 2011). Social isolation makes a person pay more attention to the underworld. Motorcycle subculture groups incorporate their lives in ways that makes a person to exercise spontaneous and planned criminal activities. In addition, a person can be attracted to outlaw motorcycle gangs because they perceive a different sense of belonging within these gangs. This might be something they have been lacking in their entire life; therefore, they decide to get involved with these gangs in order to fulfill that desire or need. The other theory is the queer ladder of mobility, which asserts that a person attracted to the outlaw motorcycle gangs with the aim to create wealth and gain

I am awesome Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

I am awesome - Essay Example Awesome managers listen to the staff since they offer insights on how to run the property better. I always share what I know with my staff not only to foster a sense of empowerment but also to make my job easier. Teaching is part of my job as I equip my staff with knowledge and skills that they can use to perform their job without constant supervision. Having regular collaboration sessions with my staff gives me a well of ideas on areas to improve in including customer satisfaction. Dedicating some little time a day to read industry news keeps me abreast with the current affairs and emerging trends in the industry (Daum, 2010). I always ask for help since I cannot pretend that I know everything. Even though everybody expects me to handle virtually everything that comes my way, I have limitations just like any other human being. I do not get embarrassed to admit not knowing an issue if confronted, and this helps me to get help from my staff. I am liberal and welcome criticisms. Instead of being defensive, I take criticism as a stepping-stone to get better at the job. I also motivate my staff and challenge them to achieve bigger. I give credit where it is due and goes an extra mile to know my staff at personal levels. I don’t micromanage my staff and always have the organization’s interest at

Social Problems Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Social Problems - Coursework Example Hence, it is critically significant to minimize or eradicate the seeming inevitable social problems in order to have healthy societies. Alcoholism is a social problem that has deleterious effects on the abuser, the close family, and the wider community (Zimberg, 2013). It is thus important to manage alcohol abuse at local levels in order to avoid undesirable ramifications. Creating awareness about the dangers of alcoholism at the societal level is a significant step towards eradicating the social problem. Typically, educational campaigns and seminars can equip the society with skills to prevent or moderate their drinking behavior. Abstinence from alcohol can be a challenging endeavor, but it does not involve any risks (Lessa & Gilbert, 2009). Thus, educating the community on the significance of avoiding alcohol can save the society from the social problem. It is crucial for the alcohol drinkers to set realistic targets for alcohol use and keep an honest record of their drinking habits. Similarly, collaborating with the policymakers and local government to establish rehabilitation centers can yield good results towar ds instilling behavioral changes on the alcohol abusers. Additionally, controlled drinking support groups can assist the drinkers to moderate their drinking habits and regain

Movie Analysis Of Walt Disneys Enchanted Film Studies Essay

Movie Analysis Of Walt Disneys Enchanted Film Studies Essay A film from Walt Disney pictures, Enchanted, is a fantasy musical film starring Amy Adams, Patrick Dempsey, James Marsden, Timothy Spall, Idina Menzel, Rachel Covey and Susan Sarandon. It is directed by Kevin Lima and written by Billy Kelly. Enchanted garnered two nominations at the 65th Golden Globe Awards and three nominations at the 80th Academy Awards. The film earned more than $340 million worldwide at the box office.1 The movie starts with a storybook showing the story in the magical kingdom of Andalasia. There is an evil queen named Narissa (Susan Sarandon) who tries to prevent her step son from marrying a maiden in fear that she will lose her throne. On the other hand, there is a girl named Giselle (Amy Adams), who hopes that a prince will come for her and share true loves kiss. Still, no matter how hard the evil queen prevents the prince from ever meeting a maiden, Prince Edward (James Marsden) still meets Giselle when he heard her singing True Loves Kiss. They fell in love at first sight and decided to marry each other. On the day of their wedding, an old lady showed up and said that she has a wedding gift for Giselle. But, it is a trap set by the evil queen. The queen pushed Giselle into the well which led her to Earth, a place which the queen called as a place where there is no happily ever afters. The comical character of Giselle became a real lady in the real world. She comes out of a manhole and, knowing nothing about the real world, is surprised with what she saw. She tries to find help on how to go back to Andalasia but ended up getting her tiara stolen by an old guy. She walks until she finds a billboard with the picture of a palace which she thought was a real one. On the way home after work of Robert Philip (Patrick Dempsey) with her daughter Morgan (Rachel Covey), Morgan told her dad that there is a princess in the castle and goes out of the cab. Giselle falls down from the billboard and fortunately Robert caught him. Seeing that Giselle had no place to stay, Robert let Giselle stay in th eir home for the night. In search for Giselle, Prince Edward goes into the real world, together with the chipmunk Pip. They also came out of the manhole which made people wonder where they are coming from. Waking up in the morning and seeing how messy the place was, Giselle called her animal friends and they cleaned the house together. Nancy (Idina Menzel) who is Roberts fianceeà ¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€¦Ã‚ ¡ saw Giselle in his home and she got mad at him. Queen Narissa sent Nathaniel to search for Prince Edward to prevent him from finding Giselle. Nathaniel met the Prince and Pip tried to say to the Prince what the Queen plans to do to Giselle but the Prince could not understand it because the chipmunk cannot talk on earth. In the meantime, Robert came with Giselle to their office. They went for a stroll in the park where Nathaniel gave Giselle a poisonous apple which she luckily did not get a chance to eat. Giselle asked Robert how Nancy knows he loves her. Giselle started singing a song which Prince Edward has luckily heard. Giselle sent Nancy a heart-shaped flowers with doves to help Robert in expressing his love for Nancy. On a restaurant where Giselle and Robert ate, Nathaniel, in an attempt to poison Giselle, gave her a poisonous drink. When she was about to drink it, Pip kicks the glass and successfully told Giselle that Prince Edward is there too. Nathaniel saw Pip so it hid under the pizza which Nathaniel threw in the fire. It made the news that Pip was still alive. Giselle was interviewed in the television where Prince Edward saw him. Prince Edward went to that place and searched for Giselle. By this time, Giselle and Robert have fallen in love with each other but they just could not admit it since they both have lovers. In the morning, the Prince met Giselle and they are both glad to see each other again. Prince Edward and Giselle went on a date so she has to say goodbye to Robert and Morgan. But Giselle went back because she has to go to the ball. Morgan helped her buy clothes with the help of her daddys credit card. Queen Narissa could not accept that Prince Edward and Giselle are together again so she followed to the real world. At the ball, she showed up as an old lady and gave Giselle an apple which made Giselle fall asleep with just one bite. Prince Edward kissed Giselle to try to wake her up, but she did not. When Robert kissed Giselle, she woke up which means that Robert is her true love. Queen Narissa turned into a dragon and fought with Giselle but Queen Narissa fell and was burned in fire. The film ends with each page of the storybook telling what happened to each character in the story at the end. Prince Edward and Nancy went back to Andalasia and got married. Nathaniel has been a well-known writer in the real world while Pip has been a well-known writer in Andalasia. Robert, Giselle and Morgan became a happy family in the real world. The excellent acting skills of the actors and actresses in the movie made it possible for the movie to win awards. Amy Adams showed how good she is not only in acting but also in singing. James Marsden also did a good job in portraying a prince, who also sings. Though Patrick Dempseys role did not require him to sing, he still did well in acting. Almost all of the casts gave justice to their roles. For the editing, I can say that it was perfect. The scene where there are even cockroaches and rats helping Giselle do the cleaning was edited nicely. Also, the transition from the fairytale to the real world was blameless. The effects used in the scene where the Dragon, Narissa, falls down the building while burning with fire and disappears magically was superbly done. I liked the costume designs of the characters especially Amy Adams and James Marsdens which shows real prince and princess outfit. The background music chosen for each scene was very appropriate. When the fight scene at the top of the castle was shown, the background music added a lot to the atmosphere of the said scene. Since this is a musical film, there has to be production numbers. I can say that they have allotted so much time in practicing for the major production number for the song Thats How You Know since we can see how coordinated everyone is and how perfect their movements are. It was a colorful one. There are old couples, brides and grooms, and even construction workers dancing too. The melody was good and was made even better by the beat of the drums and the voice of Amy Adams. There are also humorous scenes injected in the movie. One can laugh at the scene of Prince Edward when he asks the television like it was a mirror to tell him where the place Giselle was and the reporter actually said the location then Prince Edward thanked the television. Another is when Giselle made a dress out of the curtains which left a trace of the outline of the dress. Overall, I can say that I really liked this movie for it combines fairytale, which everyone has liked in their childhood, and the real world where we are. I also loved all the songs played in this movie.

Imagery in The Jungle :: Upton Sinclair

The scenes that I encountered when reading about the meat packaging industry in the early 1900's were very graphic. Some images were more graphic than others. The first scene that comes to mind when I think about the passage "The Jungle" was the huge iron wheel with pigs on it. This scene sticks out in my mind because I can almost see the pigs squealing as they are ripped away by their feet up higher and higher into the air. I can also see the massive "river" of hogs awaiting their turn to be chained up by the burly Negro. Another scene that is easy to describe is the scene where the "knockers" struck the cows on the head with a sledge hammer. In this scene all I can imagine is worn out man who has swung a sledge all day. This man would have to be worn out in a couple of years due to the physical demand. The next scene im going to describe is the scene in the steaming room. This is probably one of the most disgusting scenes in the entire text. Knowing all the germs that could poss ibly be there and the fact that there was new germs brought in every hour. The odor those men had to have worked in would have been gut wrenching. The bubbly creek was the part of the Chicago river into which all the blood, lard, hair, and any other possible thing that came off of a pig or cow was swept into. The idea that a man came along and collected the film that formed on the top and sold it as "pure lard" is appalling. And to think that unsuspecting families purchased the waste and then cooked with it. One of the jobs the men in the factory could apply for was the "knocker." This was the man who would knock out the cows before they were slid out of the "killing bed." Another job there was in the factory was the "butcher" this guy was the one who was to bleed out the cow. The way in which he did this was to make one swift stroke to the cow. After which the cow was hung to bleed out. The "headsman" was one of the other jobs men had in the factory. It was his job to make two or three swift strikes to the neck and severe the head in the fastest manner possible.